Cars and Charities - Same Horse, Different Jockey (#18)

My children insist that their old man needs a hearing test but, partially deaf or not, I had to strain to hear this great question and only grasped it at the third attempt. At this point, the student sunk back into her chair expectantly as my heart leapt.

'The student' being one of 120 Masters students who'd turned up to hear me speak for 45 minutes about consulting before taking a 15 minute opportunity to ask questions and root around in my brain. My usual preference is to minimise the lecture and open the whole thing up to questions to get a dialogue going. One hour and 6 questions later, I'd answered 4 very well, 1 ok and the other I'd fluffed. Malcolm Gladwell, on the other hand, is a master of the "forget the script and ask me a question?" approach and his speaking is all the richer for it.

Anyway, their attention was guaranteed more by the fear of knowing they were about to embark on a short real-life consultancy exercise than by my silver-tongued puppet show. The great question I had been asked at the top of this blog was something like "This SQDCP business only really works with manufacturing businesses doesn't it?"

We'd been discussing where to start when your client knows they're hurting but can't see clearly enough to self-diagnose. We'd been through Gain (e.g. growing market share) v Pain (e.g. losing business because of Quality or Delivery issues) and the importance of understanding where you're hurting Customers. Naturally we ended up on the topic of diagnosing internal pain.

I'd taken them through the trickiness of balancing SQDCP (Safety, Quality, Delivery, Cost and People) in a manufacturing business...

Safety- everyone goes home with same eyesight, fingers and toes they turned up with

Quality- we ship good Quality product (to customer spec) right first time

Delivery- we ship this good stuff on time, in full, in correct packaging & paperwork (every time)

Cost- we do all of the above at a reducing cost that lets us turn enough profit to survive, reward shareholders and reinvest

People- we nurture current and future talent to do all of the above AND to want to keep doing it which point my student questioner thrust her hand into the air and floated the query. Luckily I was prepared by a conversation I'd had a number of times, most usefully with a friend of mine who runs a charity. I do a little volunteering for this befriending charity and we'd been chatting about what to focus on to improve the charity in the next year.

So, I told the assembled students how I'd explained it for this charity supplying volunteers to befriend and help elderly people.

Safety- my friend has to ensure that each elderly person is safe with the selected volunteer, that the support task is risk assessed for both volunteer and elderly person

Quality- ensuring that the task, for example shopping or a small DIY project,  is carried out so that the shopping returns home in good condition and the shelf stays up

Delivery- the volunteer turns up when they say they will and their valuable spare time is not wasted or extended unnecessarily

Cost- this kind of charity needs every penny of funding possible to flow to the front line (minimising management/admin costs while maintaining SQD) 

People- generating a pipeline of capable, committed volunteers and developing staff to run the charity well over time.

To use a horse racing analogy, it's the same horse with a different jockey. Whatever product or service your business provides, It's likely that SQDCP thinking will broaden your view of what needs to be improved Operationally.

By the way, should our paths ever cross I'll tell you a darkly amusing story involving a pressure washer, an extension cord and an elderly client. Don't worry, nobody was harmed in the making of this anecdote.


2 views0 comments